10Apr/150

Mobile Gaming, 23 Milliards d’euros d’ici 2018 !

infog google vs apple 2018

Google versus Apple : les deux géants tirent le marché vers le haut et s’affrontent au travers de business models différents

 

L’économie des jeux sur les plateformes nomades est remarquablement efficace, et la concurrence qui s’exerce entre Apple et Google l’est tout autant.

L’App Store d’Apple et Google Play sont les deux principaux appstores du marché en volume d’applications disponibles et téléchargées.

On notera qu’en juillet 2014, ils comptabilisaient chacun plus de 1 million d’applications, loin devant Windows Phone Store, Amazon Appstore et Blackberry World. Aujourd’hui, ces deux appstores rassemblent à eux seuls  quasiment 80% des applications disponibles.

Les chiffres clés du marché mobile mondial à 2018

•    Le nombre de jeux mobiles dépasse de loin le nombre de jeux disponibles sur les autres plateformes de jeux,  offrant de nombreuses perspectives aux grands acteurs.

•    Le marché du jeu mobile s’élève à 12.8 milliards EUR en 2014. 72.6% de la valeur est générée par le jeu sur smartphone et atteindra vraisemblablement les 15 Milliards d’euros d’ici 2018

global mobile market generated by smartphone and tabletsDes modèles économiques innovants : Le free2play séduit de plus en plus de joueurs

Sur téléphone mobile, les 20 plus gros succès de l’année 2014 aux États-Unis sont des Free2Play. Ils étaient 18 en 2013.

•    Sur iTunes Store d’Apple, les jeux payants ne représentent plus que 8% du catalogue, contre 47% en 2012.

•    Le modèle Free2Play cohabite avec le modèle Pay-per-Download, mais le premier est bien plus répandu. Même les acteurs « historiques » du jeu vidéo investis dans le jeu nomade ou les « pure players » du jeu nomade ont passé le cap du Freemium, EA et Gameloft en tête.

Ce modèle a vocation à d’abord séduire le joueur avant de le faire payer. Une fois conquis, ce dernier paiera des objets virtuels en fonction de son attraction au jeu et de ses objectifs d’évolution à l’intérieur du jeu.

Pour retrouver toutes les informations concernant l’étude Mobile Gaming et les études associées, cliquez-ici

Plus d’informations sur l’expertises et les événements de l’IDATE sur :

www.idate.org          www.digiworldsummit.com          www.digiworldweek.com          www.gamesummit.pro

10Jul/13Off

Smart Home

MICHAUD LaurentLaurent Michaud
Head of Consumer Electronics & Digital Entertainment Practice at IDATE


Challenges of Consumer Electronics of Entertainment and Home automation

Despite tough economic times, the consumer electronics sector continues to deliver innovations, both technological and in the realm of usage, which have caught on with consumers. They have demonstrated, if not that value could shift to services and software, at the very least that the sector can rely on a new set of market dynamics in the medium term.

Consumers’ love of mobile devices, smartphones and tablets has not waned. According to IDATE, more than 1.5 billion smartphones and 470 million tablets will be sold in 2017, compared to just over 640 million and 114 million, respectively, in 2012. This popularity can be attributed to several factors:


These devices allow users to make calls and send text messages anywhere, anytime. So they satisfy the needs of that portion of the population that wants to be connected at all times, and even have the potential to create that need;


They give access to a huge selection of varied, simple, affordable and entertaining applications. Games are especially popular, so much so that the makers of handheld gaming devices are being hammered by this new competition. In the coming months and years gateways with other devices, and especially TV, will open up new opportunities – if not at the industrial level, most certainly in terms of fostering innovation;


They are easy to use, in particular thanks to touchscreen technology and the efforts being made by engineers, designers, developers and programmers – all of whom are aware that the user experience is key to coming out on top. Never before has it been so vital to gaining a competitive edge.


Computer vs. tablet sales, 2013-2017 (milion units)

Evolution of computer and tablet sales throughout 2017

Source: IDATE, 2013

So tablets are taking hold as central devices in the digital home. Poised to replace the personal computer, the tablet is expected to continue its rise in 2013 at a rate that was already being underestimated a few months ago. In the coming years, its popularity will be ensured by an expanded product line that includes “phablets” (phone tablets). The aim of this hybrid device is to target the larger, less wealthy section of the population. IDATE estimates that close to 2 billion tablets or phablets will have been sold between 2009 and 2017.

Companion devices, be it a tablet, a smartphone or phablet, act as second screens, or complements to users’ main screens. This relationship paves the way for a tremendous range of applications associated with television. Internet companies, media content providers, TV networks and other pay-TV package vendors will no doubt capitalise on these opportunities, if not to win back a portion of viewers who have moved to the Web, at least to deepen viewers’ relationship with their programmes.

As a result, the connected TV will be one of the cornerstones of the digital home. Like applications sold through app stores, managed and OTT interactive services could prove enough of a drawing card to persuade households to replace their old set ahead of schedule. This would be an ideal opportunity for manufacturers to have their OLED and Ultra HD technological breakthroughs adopted en masse, thanks to the appeal of having an internet-ready set. IDATE forecasts that standalone connected television sales will rise from 22 million in 2012 to 550 million in 2017.

Typical lifecyle of a television incorporating a new technology

Adoptance cycle of a television incorporating a new technology

Source : IDATE, Smart Home market insight, June 2013>

This fiercely competitive landscape provides the battleground for global dominance in the consumer electronics, telecommunications and internet sectors. Thanks to the programme begun in 2006, China is now a serious up-and-comer, moving in on American giants like Google, Apple, Amazon and Microsoft, as well as Japanese and South Korean CE titans.

The technological innovations fuelling the consumer electronics market both serve and inspire the home automation sector. A host of innovations were on display at the Consumer Electronics Show 2013 earlier this year. Although there was no lack of original ideas, it nevertheless remains that a new paradigm is taking hold and enabling the emergence of a segment long awaited by the housing industry, energy companies and users alike. Combining fixed electronic devices (IP boxes, set-top boxes and integrated technologies) with sensors, OLED displays, recognition tools, augmented reality, an internet connection, a WYSIWYG software interface, and more economical home security, energy management and personal home services solutions (for now). Management and remote control features using a mobile device provide increased flexibility and the ability to supply a tracking system that could be monetised.

This is an excerpt of our insight "Smart Home"

9Mar/12Off

Some thoughts on the new iPad 3

Basile CarleBasile CARLE

Senior Consultant, Mobile Devices & Platforms Expert DigiWorld by IDATE

 

The new iPad unveiled by Apple yesterday was much as expected. Rumors during the run-up proved fairly accurate when it came to the main features of this third version of Apple’s tablet (especially retina display and 4G) and we believe that this update is a fairly solid response to what competitors have been able to produce so far. No groundbreaking features but rather improvements aimed at strengthening Apple’s position in the market. 

Below are some thoughts on what we learned yesterday. These analyses build on our ongoing research on the mobile device market – as found in last year’s report on LTE devices (which is part of our LTE Watch service). If you are interested in this topic, an in-depth analysis of mobile device manufacturers’ strategy and future mobile device innovations, can be found in our upcoming report on Next Generation Mobile Devices which is due out in Q2 2012.

  • Support for LTE is not necessarily the main advantage of the iPad as is a feature aimed chiefly at users in the US. The new iPad, powered by Qualcomm multimode LTE baseband, supports both 700 MHz and 2100 MHz LTE bands which in itself limits its interest worldwide. Those two bands are and won’t be the much used by operators when deploying their LTE networks. From a European perspective for instance, the device will need to support the 800MHz, 1800MHz and 2.6GHz bands to be usable. But this is not a major issue, given the limited deployments so far in those frequency bands. What this LTE support tells us is how important Long-term evolution has become in the US as a differentiating argument in the mobile device market. It’s also impressive to see how much the US wireless market has evolved over last 4 years. Remember when the first iPhone was launched back in 2007, with no support for 3G because of those new-gen networks were still embryonic in America? Now, the US is at the forefront in deploying the latest radio access network technology, and Apple could not ignore it when targeting its domestic market. It is still unclear how far US operators have been pushing Apple to go that way, but one thing is sure: the announcement that the latest iPad supports LTE was clearly US-driven.
  • Given the low rate of deployment for LTE networks outside the US (and Japan and South Korea which are the two other big LTE markets), and the increasing number of bands to be supported, supporting DC HSPA+ and HSPA+ was Apple’s only option to limit the number of different versions of the iPad and have 4G-branded iPads sold internationally. There has been a lot of debate over whether or not it was fair to use the term 4G for DC HSPA+ and HSPA+ technologies. They are indeed evolutions of 3G standards; their performance is an improvement over what we are used to and, for everyday uses, can be considered to deliver “LTE like” performance. We should also remember that even LTE is not considered by the 3GPP as a 4G technology: only LTE-Advanced and WiMAX IEE 802.16m are considered as such. In any even, from a market and network deployment perspective, supporting DC HSPA+ and HSPA+ was the best solution for the non-US market. Operators all over the world announce are upgrading their networks to this standard to able to support downlink rates of up to 42 Mbps (in dual carrier mode). The new iPad will support this maximum theoretical bitrate, while DC HSPA+ will eventually be able to sustain 84 Mbps. Plus these deployments will be in existing 3G bands, so Apple will not need to provide support for other bands.
  • Apple is by no means the first device manufacturer to announce support for LTE. Samsung, HTC, LG and especially Motorola were first to launch such devices in the American, South Korean and Japanese markets. As we expected and noted in our report on LTE Devices and in our LTE Watch service insight last year, Apple has taken a more cautious approach in its release timetable, waiting for baseband solutions to be mature enough to lessen the number of wireless versions of the iPad, and enable Apple to provide a solid enough 4G experience in terms of battery life. Here, Qualcomm was the most relevant solution for Apple – providing the broadest support for RAN. As mentioned earlier, providing support for DC HSPA+ alongside LTE and CDMA2000 EV/DO was a strategic move on Apple’s part – both in terms of industrial process (reducing manufacturing and BOM costs) and marketing (being able to call it 4G worldwide).
  • In terms of battery life, Apple could not afford any noticeable reduction in performance when using 4G. Of course new LTE basebands from Qualcomm (probably the MDM 9600) somehow reduced their footprint, but also forced Apple to perform some major reengineering to handle increased drain on the battery. This basically boils down to making more room for bigger batteries, without altering the form too much. The relative increase in the new device’s thickness (9.4mm as compared to 8.8mm for the iPad 2) is an indication of how challenging it was for Apple to provide support for LTE and deliver increased graphical performance required for the retina display. When we look at the specs, the new iPad battery is a 42.5 watt-hour unit, as compared to a 25 watt hour battery previously… so nearly twice the capacity as before. Impressive. It still remains to be seen how the new iPad compares to other LTE tablets. There appears to be a growing consensus around the web that the new iPhone will naturally support LTE as well. I’m not so sure, as the design constraints this involved for a smartphone are a whole other ball game. It will be much harder to make extra space for increased capacity battery. In any case, the technical challenges are big enough for me to think that, should it support LTE, the new iPhone will be rolled out in October rather than in June.
  • Speaking of form factors and screen size, the latest iPad offers nothing new on this front – which confirm our previous analysis on the subject. Indeed, a different size of screen was very unlikely because of the hardware fragmentation it would have prompted, which is a major issue for third-party developers. Apple yesterday announced that 200,000 iPad specific applications were available on the App Store. This is of course part of the success of this device, and one big difference with Android tablets today in terms of ecosystem maturity. For an app developer, having to think of different screen sizes only burdens the development process in terms of both time and money. In terms of user experience, ensuring that all applications will behave the same way across all devices of the same category is strategic, and Apple clearly had this in mind when making the choice of not bringing further fragmentation in terms of screen size.
  • The Retina display is probably the most obvious improvement. The previous iPad had just a standard resolution for a 9.7-inch display, but the pixel density of the new iPad really makes a difference … both with the previous model and with what the competition is offering. It is not sure how many of Apple’s display partners (LG? Samsung? Hitachi? Sharp? Panasonic?) are involved here, and if competitors will have access to this technology (it took some time for Apple’s competitors to release a smartphone with higher ppi than the iPhone 4S). What is certain is that Apple may well prevent its rivals from getting their hands on the technology by occupying the production channel. Given Apple’s unmatched capacity to order such components in very high volumes, its competitors will likely find it difficult to find enough components for their own devices.
  • In all of this, there has been no mention of Amazon and its Kindle Fire… even though it is reported to be Apple’s most successful competitor in the tablet market. Apple still isn’t targeting this segment of the market overtly, even with a lower-priced iPad in its line-up. This may be a sign that, for Apple, Amazon is more a competitor for Android tablets than for the iPad which is aimed at the mid-range to high-end market.
More information about our activities : http://idate.org
27Feb/12Off

Apps & the mobile Internet : The battle of the platforms: both native and Web apps

 Soichi NAKAJIMA

 Senior Consultant - DigiWorld Institute by IDATE

Mobile Internet is here and geared for growth, despite the global recession. For 2016 the worldwide penetration rate of Mobile Internet will reach 34.7% - or 2.89 billion users - generating service revenues (apps and advertising) of 43.3 billion EUR. IDATE has published a report dedicated to the mobile Internet providing its readers with detailed information about market's structure, data & forecasts 2008-2016, player profiles and strategies. It also spotlights the current and upcoming trends and the different kinds of mobile Internet usages. 

“Since the introduction of the Apple App Store, the focus in the mobile Internet has been mainly on the ‘Battle of the OS’. This is now seemingly all but over, with Apple and Google in a victorious duopoly. The scenario has now shifted to the ‘Battle of the platforms’, with players such as FaceBook and Amazon, who do not own an OS, joining the fray, and who are providing alternative platforms which aim to bypass the native OS system”, says Soichi Nakajima, senior consultant at IDATE

Focus on the tablet market

It is just recently in 2010 that the tablet market started growing with the introduction of Apple iPad. In 2010, around 19 million tablets were sold, 16 million of them by Apple, which even in 2011 remained the clear leader.

Contrary to the smartphone market where Android has reached a leader position, the tablet market is still by far dominated by one manufacturer. Apple indeed has the advantage of being the first mover and different factors have hindered any significant growth by Android.

  • Even when the Android Honeycomb was released, the Tablet OS was still a beta version, which found it difficult to compete with the already mature iOS. Because of this beta status of Android for tablets, Google only distributed the OS to selected partners. This resulted in some manufacturers launching products powered by the smartphone version of Android. This also led to voices being raised against Google for not respecting the Open Source agreement that tied it to the developer community. Although several improvements were gradually brought to Honeycomb, the next version of Android, known as Ice Cream Sandwich (Android 4.0), should bring more maturity to the system.
  • The delayed and restricted release of Honeycomb along with its associated SDK did not help, leading to a lack of available apps adapted to tablets. While Apple App Store and Google Android Market are more or less on a par on the smartphone segment, they are still worlds apart in terms of tablet specific app catalogues. As of end Q3 2011, the App Store referenced 140,000 different iPad specific apps while there were comparatively few of them on the Android market
  • The fact that the tablet is a new segment has enabled other tablet operating systems to gain some visibility, such as QNX OS that powers RIM Playbook or WebOS which powered HP Touchpad devices. Although these tablets were not hugely successful, they brought differentiated user experience in a world where it is very difficult to differentiate oneself in the Android ecosystem

Worldwide tablet sales ('000)

Source: IDATE

In the near future, it can be expected that Apple will gradually lose its market share as their competitors gradually come up with better counter-offers. What happened on the smartphone market will be repeated on the tablet market, although probably at a quicker pace. On the smartphone market, it took two years before competitors started having true ‘iPhone killer’ products. For tablets we expect Android to pass iOS in terms of sales in 2013. One big question mark is related to legal disputes on the market for patent infringement issues.

Download Press Realease

Visit our Website for further information about our researches

Soichi Nakajima - Project Manager - s.nakajima@idate.org

Jeremy Georges - j.geroges@idate.org

22Jun/11Off

Mobile Video

Market and forecasts 2010-2015: smartphone and tablet traffic skyrocketing


IDATE has just released its “Mobile Video” report which takes a look at the mobile video market and its different business models, technologies and core devices. It also provides readers with an analysis of the market and forecasts for its development up to 2015, along with key data on the stakeholders, traffic and sales.

“The global mobile video market (cellular networks only) was worth an estimated 4.3 billion EUR in 2010, and forecast to reach 12.6 billion EUR in 2015, which translates into a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 24% for the period. The increase is even more impressive when looking at traffic volume (i.e. number of video minutes) which is due to rise at an average annual rate of more than 80% over the next five years. OTT (over-the-top, i.e. online) traffic accounts for the majority of video viewing time on mobile networks: 60% in 2010, and increasing to 70% in 2015,” says Project manager and Senior consultant Samuel Ropert.

Breakdown of video minutes consumed on mobile networks worldwide in 2010, by type of network infrastructure

Mobile video market in the biggest countries in 2010


The United States and Japan top the ranks of the world mobile video market on cellular networks. Over in Europe, Italy is the biggest market at close to 300 million EUR, followed by Germany. Italy owes its status to heavy take-up levels combined with an attractive selection of content, such as championship football, which stimulates usage and sales revenue. The price of a basic mobile video service is also much cheaper in Italy than in other countries, plus users have the ability to pay by the week and not just by the month as is usually the case.
Japan’s mobile video market is being undermined by the broadcast video market (which is not covered in this report) which is free for users, but which generates hundreds of millions of euros in ad revenue.

Mobile video market in million EUR, Europe-Top 5, 2010-2015

 

Project manager
Samuel ROPERT

Please also visit our website with the latest news about our research programme.